Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. prepared a plan for the City of Holyoke & The Holyoke Redevelopment Authority on August 2nd 2009. This plan is available as a beautiful PDF document, and I've reproduced the entire plan below for those who prefer to read online (and so that the contents of the plan can be scooped up by search engines & easily found by those interested in the topic). You can click every image to view its larger version without leaving this page, and you can use the links in the Table of Contents to jump down to specific sections (and link to or bookmark those specific sections). Enjoy.
This plan was produced by over 400 Holyokers who shaped this agenda for our City’s future by participating in public forums, interviews, focus groups and other activities. Participants came from all of the city’s neighborhoods, and represented a wide range of cultural, ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds to be found here.
Kathleen Anderson / Jeffrey Burkott / Thomas Creed / John Dyjach / Carl Eger, Jr. David Guzman / Karen Mendrala / Eileen Regan
Carl Eger, Jr., Chair / Patricia Duffy, Vice-Chair / Thomas Creed, Treasurer / Leida Cartagena, Assistant Treasurer / Jacqueline Watson, Member
Geoffrey Morrison-Logan / James “Jef” Fasser
The Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development
Amedeo’s Restaurant & Pizzeria / Church of God Mission Board / The Log Cabin & The Delaney House / Holyoke Council on Aging / Holyoke School Department / Holyoke Department of Public Works / McDonald’s Restaurant / Templo Ebenezer / Our Lady of Guadalupe Church / War Memorial Commissioners / residents Virgenmina Viera and Joseph Kingsley
This following Center City Vision Plan was prepared to set the framework for the revitalization of the historic core of the city, which was once the vibrant centerpiece of this planned industrial community. As with many other industrial cities throughout New England, Holyoke is proactively planning ahead for the future reinvestment in its Center City area by working closely with its diverse community of residents, business owners, institutions and numerous organizations, to help shape a plan. The Vision Plan identifies opportunities to capitalize on the unique aspects of Holyoke’s industrial heritage and green power generation, while embracing new opportunities for job growth, population growth and place making. This will set the direction for the Center City and its neighborhoods to realize their future potential.
The Center City project area consists of four census tracts (figure 1) and includes the neighborhoods of South Holyoke, The Flats, Downtown/Prospect Heights and Churchill. This area has frontage along the Connecticut River and includes the three power generating canals that helped support the original growth of Holyoke. These neighborhoods once comprised the urban core of the City including a central business district along High and Maple Streets, manufacturing sites along the three canals, associated employee housing surrounding these areas and commercial uses to support urban living. However, this part of the City has seen a significant disinvestment in recent years, leaving many vacant and underutilized parcels and buildings. Presently, the area has a great need for reinvestment and revitalization in order for it to prosper and thrive, and, fortunately, the City is currently taking action and seeing signs of new investment in this area.
Some of the investment that is currently taking place includes:
See below for a showcase photographs of some of the more notable buildings and scenes in the Center City area. These photographs are grouped by the Vision Plan topic they best represent, including civic/public buildings, types of housing, open space, mixed-use corridors, historic structures and mills, industrial buildings, vacant buildings/parcels and community character.
Recently, the City has initiated a number of actions to guide the revitalization effort of the Center City area. The City has recently formed the Holyoke Redevelopment Authority (HRA) whose immediate focus is the revitalization of this area of the city.
One of the first tasks undertaken by the HRA was the preparation of this Vision Plan. This process included a comprehensive analysis of the project area, preparation of a development framework for the various sections within the Center City, and recommendations for redevelopment actions to revitalize the area. Actions address all elements of the Center City area including housing, streets and open space along with commercial and industrial development. Anticipated results include job creation, expanded housing choices, improved urban environment and quality of life issues such as walkability, cultural activities and education.
A major component of this planning study was significant public outreach to assure that the Vision Plan evolved from the community. The outreach process included focus group meetings with numerous interest groups, three public meetings and additional outreach by City staff. The outreach concentrated on building and strengthening existing community collaborations and initiatives as well as working to build new relationships with organizations, community groups and individuals.
The result of this visioning process will lay the groundwork for an Urban Renewal Plan to create vibrant, diverse, safe neighborhoods in downtown Holyoke where all residents can live, work and play.
The following report provides a summary of the items considered in the planning process and the elements that constitute the Center City Vision Plan.
The Center City Vision Plan was developed over a five month period structured around initial stakeholder interviews and three public workshops, each organized to gain input about issues and opportunities, Vision Plan alternatives and the preferred Vision Plan.
The planning process started by conducting a series of interviews with stakeholders over a two-day period to gain insight on the issues and opportunities that were relevant to the Center City study area. The interviews were held at City’s Office of Planning and Development and at the Visitors Center in Heritage State Park, where more than 100 people attended. The interviews were organized by topic area and included representatives from the business, non-profit, housing, healthcare, and education industries. In addition, City Councilors, multiple City departments, private property owners, retailers, realtors and developers were interviewed.
The three public workshops were advertised through the local media including the City cable access channel, City web site and Spanish radio Station WSPR, at local churches, as well as through the use of flyers and community boards that were distributed and/or placed within the neighborhoods in the study area. These materials were translated into Spanish to expand community outreach efforts.
The extensive outreach efforts led an average turnout of 80–100 people for each of the public meetings, where the consultants and City staff provided a brief presentation followed by “break-out” group discussions on the material that was presented that evening. Translation services were provided at the public meetings to accommodate Spanish speaking participants. Each group was asked to “report back” what they discussed so that their concerns and goals could be considered in developing the vision for the Center City. The meetings focus on the following topics;
The City appointed a Steering Committee that worked closely with the consultants throughout the development of the Vision Plan. The committee consisted of members from the City Office of Planning and Development and members of the Holyoke Redevelopment Authority (HRA), the Holyoke Planning Board and the Holyoke Economic Development and Industrial Corporation (HEDIC). Meetings with the Steering Committee were held regularly to provide guidance on project coordination, development of the alternatives, refinement of the preferred Vision Plan and strategies for implementation actions that will result from this plan.
The City of Holyoke and the HRA prepared this Vision Plan to understand community values that will guide the preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan for the Center City area that reflects citizen aspirations and preferences for the future of their community. The broad public involvement and resulting plan are essential to provide guidance to municipal officials and board members as they advance efforts and actions intended to stimulate the revitalization of this area of the City.
In order to address the critical issues that will impact the redevelopment potential of the Center City area, this vision planning process addressed the following goals and objectives:Goal: Conduct an extensive public outreach process to achieve broad community input into the Center City Vision Plan
The benefit of this community visioning process was that it provided an oppor- tunity for citizen input into the municipal planning process and revitalization plan. This process provided a sense of community ownership in the development of a plan and, thus, support for its recommendations. Furthermore, this on-going process of communication among the citizens helped reconcile conflicting views resulting in an agreement on preferred courses of action. It also helped to facilitate intergovernmental cooperation and partnerships to resolve problems.
The Opportunities and Challenges Map (below) was developed to iden- tify a series of issues that the Vision Plan should consider and/or build upon.
The map reflects observations, community input and information provided at the stakeholder interviews, and has helped set the planning framework for the Vision Plan. Each of the components identified on the map is summarized in the paragraphs below. The adjacent text box includes a list of the ideas that emerged from the stakeholder interviews and first public forum. The list is not organized by priority, but rather by common recommendations that were discussed.
Three preliminary Alternatives were prepared for the study area based on the issues and opportunities that were identified during the stakeholder interviews, results from the first public forum and the Opportunities Map that was prepared. The alternatives identify a framework for revitalization activities, both public and private, such as areas for future development and redevelopment, areas recommended for rehabilitation, infrastructure improvements, open space and streetscape improvements, recommended land uses and similar activities that will help to revitalize the area.
Each alternative includes a series of elements that are common to all three. These include considerations for: Complete Streets, City Parks, City Bridges, Streetscape, Canalwalk, Neighborhood Initiatives, Mix Use Centers, Arts/History, Jobs/Industry/Commerce, and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). Each of these “Common Elements” is shown in the legend on the opposite page.
The differences between the alternatives are denoted by their individual approaches to certain land uses within sub-areas of the Center City. These differences are shown with darker colors as indicated in the legend below. During the initial discussions with the stakeholders and community members, multiple ideas emerged about how to treat future growth within these areas. The summary of these differences are highlighted in the description of each alternative plan.
Based on the feedback from the second public forum and comments from the City and Steering Committee, a preferred Vision Plan was created that incorporates many of the aspects shown in alternative three.
Based on the results from the second and third public forums and comments received from the Steering Committee, a Vision Plan and revised framework diagram was created for the Center City area that outlines goals and objectives for its future redevelopment and revitalization. This chapter provides an overview of the six key elements that define the Vision Plan. The plan identifies both site specific strategies and broad principles that will provide guidance to the community and the City as plans and initiatives are advanced and projects are implemented.
Through the community process and feedback received on the Vision Plan, it was evident that increasing the density and types of development, creating new jobs, providing more housing choices and preserving Holyoke’s historic character were all important considerations. Equally important was the desire to improve connectivity to and throughout the Center City, making the neighborhoods and the downtown amenities more accessible. These and other “core principles” are outlined on the opposite page. The Vision Plan expands upon these initiatives and is described in the following pages of this chapter that describe:
The Vision Plan was prepared in conjunction with the revised Framework Diagram that illustrates various goals for land uses, initiatives, and connections within the Center City.
Holyoke’s Center City is, in part, defined by its grid of streets, location of its mixed use centers, or “Main Streets”, proximity of its urban neighborhoods, and the existing mix of uses that are located within each of its areas. High Street, Maple Street and Main Street have historically been the mixed-use activity centers that have catered to Holyoke’s retailers and businesses and have provided services to downtown employees and residents. There is an opportunity to reconnect and strengthen these various streets and places within the Center City by focusing redevelopment, future development, streetscape enhancements and cultural activities within four “key nodes” of the downtown. Equally important is connecting these nodes to each other, as well as the neighborhoods that abut them, ultimately becoming a “porthole” that links neighborhoods and the downtown back together.
The Vision Plan identifies four nodes where development and redevelopment should support the overall goal for a vibrant urban center filled with active ground floor and broad mix of retail, office, business, residential and institutional uses. Each node has the potential to build upon a theme based on the existing land uses that help define its existing character and future potential. Connections between these nodes should be enhanced through improved streetscape and transportation choices, such as improved sidewalks and a downtown bus circulator.
“Municipal” Node: Build on the existing municipal uses such as City Hall, Veteran’s Park and the planned expansion of a new park behind City Hall. Promote and expand downtown cultural actives such as the St. Patrick’s Day Parade and “Celebrate Holyoke Day” to bring events to this civic area.
“Learning” Node: Celebrate the theme of “learning” by advancing the planned improvements to the City Library and the potential to create a new park adjacent to the new or renovated Lawrence School.
“Transit-Oriented Development” Node: Plan for future passenger rail service that will link Holyoke to Hartford and the region’s “Innovation Corridor”. Promote mixed-use development with active ground floor uses, with opportunities for new high density housing. Restore connections to the Flats by implementing the proposed rail bridge and enhancing connections to downtown via Dwight Street.
“Cabot and Main” Node: Promote infill development and redevelopment that enhances the character of Main and Cabot Streets with a mixed of uses that activate the street. Seek development that creates a sense of place and provides for enhanced connections to the South Holyoke neighborhood.
Holyoke was founded on its innovative approach to power generation, by capturing energy from the Connecticut River. Its history as an industrial city and inventory of architecturally rich mill buildings provides a unique foundation for a continued emergence of an “Arts and Innovation” district. The community process identified the existing artist community that is occupying space within buildings near the 1st and 2nd Level Canals. In addition, the community stated a preference to extend the Arts & Industry Overlay District to with the Arts and Innovation District extending from the 1st and 2nd Level Canals to Maple and High Streets so that the Victory Theater and War Memorial Building are part of the district.
The Vision Plan identifies a general boundary where the theme of Arts and Innovation should be explored (see image below). Multiple efforts will continue to support the emergence of this district by:
Holyoke is home to several notable parks such as the Heritage State Park that celebrates Holyoke’s unique history as the first planned industrial city; Pulaski Park, which was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted—an internationally recognized landscape architect. Figure 6 identifies these and other existing parks and suggests ways to introduce new open spaces, parks, expansions to the Canalwalk and potential streetscape enhancements that will connect these amenities throughout the Center City. The following summarizes the potential enhancements to the network of open spaces.
Heritage State Park Area
New Lawrence School Park
Expand McNally Field to Canal
Build a network of linkages to connect open spaces
Expand South Holyoke’s playground at Morgan School
The existing riverfront properties that are located between the Connecticut River and the 2nd Level Canal are mostly occupied by industrial uses. In addition, this area has several vacant buildings, some of which have recently been demolished and are being cleared for their potential future redevelopment. The Vision Plan has identified that this area continue to be used for job creation and commerce, targeting new development that can capitalize on the industrial and green technology industries. The Vision Plan also identifies the potential to extend the Canalwalk on the western side of North and South Canal Streets. As redevelopment and investment occurs along these riverfront properties, emphasis should be placed on the building edges and landscaping that fronts the Canal to enhance the aesthetics of this area. The following goals should be considered as properties redevelop along the riverfront;
There are opportunities to “enhance” each of the four Center City neighborhoods by advancing new infill development, improving their appearance through cleanup programs, and creating new community gardens where residents benefit from access to locally grown foods.
The Vision Plan has identified various opportunities for infill sites that can accommodate a wide range of housing and mixed-use development. These are sites that are vacant, underutilized, or could be redeveloped. Figure 8 illustrates that these sites are scattered throughout each of the Center City’s four census tracts. Future development on these sites should be in scale and character with the surrounding context and should contribute to their urban setting by fronting buildings towards the street and accommodating parking within the internal portions of their lots or at the rear of the buildings.
Many of the existing vacant lots are adjacent to the residential uses. New development should expand upon the existing housing choices to provide a variety of unit types that can cater to Holyoke’s existing and future population and income levels. Opportunities for home ownership should be expanded to provide balance between the higher concentrations of rental units that are located within the Center City.
Existing neighborhood clean-up programs should continue to advance efforts to help these neighborhoods improve their appearance. The City should work closely with its neighborhood-based organizations and the Department of Public Works to advance efforts on trash pick-up and litter education.
During the planning processes, participants noted the need for improved code enforcement to ensure that buildings and properties are in compliance with health and safety codes. In addition, participants expressed a desire to add more community gardens within each neighborhood so that residents can benefit from access to locally grown foods. The City should explore opportunities to convert appropriately placed and accessible vacant lots into community gardens.
The Center City area has a set of distinct boundaries that include; the Connecticut River to north and east, I-391 to the south and Route 202 to the west. Celebrating arrival to the Center City can be highlighted by making enhancements to key points of entry or “gateways”. Internally, the Center City is home to four urban neighborhoods, each geographically located at its four corners. Improvements to the existing grid of streets offer the opportunity to reconnect these urban neighborhoods to each other and the adjacent mixed-use centers like High and Main Streets.
The Vision Plan has identified a series of gateway locations that should be enhanced to celebrate arrival to the downtown (See image below). In addition, the Vision Plan recommends improvements to several east-west streets that will link the four neighborhoods and downtown together. During the planning process, residents, business owners and other stakeholders raised a number of transportation-related issues. These issues included improving the following: existing sidewalks, roadway infrastructure, truck access, traffic circulation and streetscape/gateways. Enhancing these transportation elements, along with strategic roadway planning to improve connectivity, will improve the transportation network and assist in economic development and revitalization of the downtown. See Chapter 4 for further information regarding Transportation improvements.
Streetscape and Street Improvements:
During the planning process, residents, business owners and other stakeholders raised a number of transportation-related issues. These issues included improving the following: existing sidewalks, roadway infrastructure, truck access, traffic circulation and streetscape/gateways. Enhancing these transportation elements, along with strategic roadway planning to improve connectivity, will improve the transportation network and assist in economic development and revitalization of the downtown. Furthermore, the transportation elements of this plan present a strategic effort to make the downtown transportation system a safer, more efficient and attractive asset to the City. The following are strategic elements that can be implemented; these elements are highlighted in Chapter 3 of the Vision Plan.
Street connectivity needs to be improved to eliminate the need for vehicles and pedestrians to take indirect and inefficient routes via one-way, residential streets or streets without sidewalks when accessing destinations. Without improvement, increased traffic loads and pedestrian activity could reduce safety and efficiency. Goals for this element could include:
Pedestrian and Bicycle: Creating more attractive opportunities to park and walk, or park and cycle in and around the downtown is a primary goal. An effort is already being made by the City to improve this by revitalizing the Holyoke Canal and creating a Canalwalk that will provide linkage between many cultural amenities, businesses and other destinations. Chapter 3 of the Vision Plan discusses opportunities to reconnect the Center City by creating complete streets, developing key nodes, and restoring the urban neighborhoods. Special consideration should be given to connect parks, civic uses, neighborhoods, schools, open spaces, the canals, and destinations like the Volleyball Hall of Fame, Heritage State Park, Children’s Museum, etc. via an enhanced pedestrian and bicycle network.
Non-Motorized Transportation: Decrease the reliance upon the automobile. The Intermodal Transportation Center is a key element that will bring Peter Pan Bus Service to the City. The City should use this as an opportunity to create opportunities to expand bus service throughout the downtown to key destinations to/from the center.
Future Passenger Rail: Planning for future passenger rail can help revitalize the downtown by promoting another alternative transportation mode that can draw people into Holyoke from other cities, towns and states. In addition, this type of service will provide an opportunity to the redevelopment of the area around the passenger rail station, which is often referred to as Transit Oriented Development (TOD). Providing adequate parking, circulation/access for pick-up and drop-off, and designing a transportation/pedestrian network that will connect to the downtown nodes, will ensure the success of passenger rail.
Pedestrian connectivity at Mitchell Field: Mitchell Field is separated by Route 202 between Linden Street and Beech Street on the northerly end of the downtown. Connecting the fields on the northerly and southerly side of Route 202 would improve pedestrian connectivity and increase opportunities to utilize this area more efficiently. However, traffic circulation would need to be reviewed more closely, as joining this park would divert traffic and increase traffic flow on the adjacent streets of Linden Street, Dwight Street and Beech Street.
Truck Circulation: Truck access and circulation is critical to the revitalization of the downtown. A truck routing plan should be prepared to meet the needs for developing key nodes and reconnecting the City. This plan should pay particular attention to the future redevelopment of the riverfront and the major roadways/ highways used to access downtown, including I-391, Route 202, Route 141 and Route 116. Additionally, the location of low clearance bridges on local streets should be reviewed, including Jackson Street, Sargeant Street, Cabot Street, Appleton Street (south of Main Street), Mosher Street, and Race Street. Improvements at low clearance bridges or improving infrastructure on adjacent roadways to support a truck route should be explored.
Bicycling, walking and the use of other non-motorized forms of transportation are integral elements of the downtown transportation network. Attractive and safe pedestrian, bicycle and recreation facilities can help improve the downtown’s sense of character, charm, accessibility, and circulation. As evidenced in future plans to enhance downtown, i.e. the Canalwalk Project and the Intermodal Transportation Center, the importance of establishing a continuous network for non-motorized transportation users is essential. A fluid non-motorized transportation network can significantly decrease the reliance upon the automobile, increase pedestrian circulation (near shops and retail) and help relieve congestion on area roadways. Additionally, the establishment of such a network can have profound positive impacts on social equity and access as well as the health of a community. Implementing enhancements and sidewalk features along major corridors (Maple, High and Main Street) and other connector streets (Appleton, Dwight and Lyman Street) would reconnect the Center City. The following lists enhancements that could be implemented:
Neckdowns: These curb extensions shorten the walking distance for pedestrians crossing the roadway from curb to curb. These extensions call attention to pedestrians and help define on-street parking. This treatment works well in downtown settings.
Enhanced Crosswalks: Include pavement markings, colored and textured treatments and raised crosswalks which can also be called speed tables. Raised crosswalks are good for locations where drivers may not expect pedestrians to be crossing the roadway and where vehicle speeds are excessive.
Sidewalks Features: Brick accent strips and other sidewalk patterns and amenities can enhance and define a transportation corridor including streetscape and street lighting. The City has made the transformation of the downtown area into a vibrant place a top priority. The underlying goals of this vast revitalization include increased economic development, improved housing and improved community facilities. Aesthetic enhancements will likely not only result in increased pedestrian circulation through downtown but will also likely attract more businesses to the area. Conversely, a poor or unattractive environment can be a repellent to visitors and businesses and hinder economic development.
The existing street network in the downtown area has a tendency to detour or direct visitors along specific routes, sometime bypassing key destinations. This has extremely significant consequences for the economic development of certain areas. Visual and aesthetic improvements to the transportation network will help draw visitors to the City, but improved circulation will help bring visitors and businesses in with the ultimate goal of redeveloping key areas. The circulation patterns of traffic can be very influential because they can help dictate future economic development areas by exposing more traffic to businesses. Goals for this element include:
Downtown Gateways: Develop a supplemental gateway program that builds upon the City’s signage gateway program already in place. This plan should be harmonious with the City’s streetscape elements for the primary gateways into the City that clearly define City character and efficiently guide the roadway user. Gateways often provide the first impression of the City to the visitor.
Two-Way Streets: Creating two-way streets from one-way streets. Previous studies have evaluated the conversion of High Street and Maple Street, between Appleton Street and Lyman Street, to a two-way roadway. The results of this study appeared to be favorable; however, further studies need to be conducted to determine the actual costs to make this transformation and evaluate if the existing roadway cross-section can accommodate two-way traffic flow without widening. In addition, the limits of this improvement should be further reviewed to extend to the limits that are consistent with this Vision Plan and the location of developing key nodes; this may mean extending the two-way configuration to Cabot Street.
Wayfinding Signs: The City is currently in the process of implementing a wayfinding program that creates a visual aid to guide the transportation user to parking and attractions, as well as identify historic areas of the downtown. The intent of a wayfinding signage program is to create a clear and inviting community feel, preserving and enhancing the character of the community while also guiding the roadway user efficiently to their destination. This program can have significant benefits to the community.
One-Way Streets/Dead-Ends: Creating one-way streets or dead-ends in the Flats or South Holyoke to discourage cut-through traffic and promote traffic flow on major corridors.
Pavement Marking, Signage, and Traffic Signals: The presentation of the downtown character can be largely conveyed through its transportation system. A network of signage and pavement markings that is clear, clean, and concise can safely and efficiently guide the transportation network user through the downtown. In addition, ornamental traffic signals and implementation of new traffic signals can help control traffic and still provide character to the downtown.
The Center City Vision Plan sets the goals and framework for a number of initiatives to help transform this part of the City into a vibrant Center City. With this Vision Plan in place, many individual but unified actions can occur within the revitalization framework that will support the overall recommendations of this plan. For example, public improvements to streets, parks and buildings, as well as private actions for parcel development or building rehabilitation, can now be planned and occur knowing how they will fit into this larger framework for the entire Center City area.
There are a number of actions the City and HRA can initiate to start achieving the recommendations of the Vision Plan. These include:
In addition to these general initiatives for the Center City area, prioritized and key specific initiatives for the six Vision Plan elements are described in the table beginning on the opposite page.
One of the primary goals of Vision Plan was to provide the basis for the Holyoke Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to prepare an urban renewal plan for all or a portion of the Center City area. An urban renewal plan is an implementation strategy and tool for revitalization projects, and preparing such a plan will enable the HRA to take certain action to stimulate private investment in the area. One of the main reasons for doing an Urban Renewal Plan is to document why public investment and actions are needed to stimulate private investment. This is typically referred to as the “But For” factor – “But For” public action, the normal activities of private enterprise alone would not result in economic investment in the identified area. It is important to note that the City and HRA cannot dictate private investment in the area, but they can assist and promote private investment through an urban renewal plan. The Urban Renewal Plan must be prepared an implemented in accordance with M.G.L. Chapter 121B, and the Urban Renewal Guidelines prepared by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
One of the first steps in the Urban Renewal Planning process is to define the proposed urban renewal area. Once an initial area is identified, critical data and statistics can be collected, an in-depth analysis can occur and public actions can be identified that are intended to attract private investment into the area. Key elements of an urban renewal plan include:
The City and HRA should build upon the momentum of the Vision Plan and begin using it as a planning tool for future actions in the Center City area and also as the basis for the preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan.
|VISION PLAN ELEMENT||INITIATIVES||LOCATION|
|Develop Key NodesTo strengthen the four nodes, City officials should continue to advance various initiates within each node.||Municipal Node||Work with the potential developer of the Diocese property to advance plans for residential development in those currently vacant buildings. Complete the Intermodal Center and pedestrian connections to this multi-modal facility.||Municipal Node|
|Transit-Oriented Development Node||Continue to work with State officials to identify the preferred loca- tion for the new passenger rail station and then begin planning for mixed-use Transit Oriented Development around that location.||Transit-Oriented Development Node|
|Learning Node||Advance the School Department’s plan for the expansion or reuse of the Lawrence school, which will then inform the use of the adjacent vacant block of land.||Learning Node|
|Cabot and Main Node||Encourage additional economic development in the area as well as connections into the South Holyoke Neighborhood.||Cabot and Main Node|
|Enhance the Arts & Innovation District||Continue to encourage and support the growing artist’s community and businesses in this area. Support plans to restore the Victory Theater.|
Look for opportunities to attract new “innovation” businesses into this area.
Continue to construct the Canalwalk to improve pedestrian connections throughout this area.Arts & Innovation DistrictExpand Open Space Amenities Design and construct all phases of the current Canalwalk Master Plan and expand the Master Plan to include connections to and along the 3rd Level Canal.
Continue to make improvements to Pulaski Park, work with the Friends of Pulaski Park for joint initiatives.
Enhance and expand open space resources as funding permits.Throughout DowntownTransform the Riverfront There are many opportunities for new development and building rehabilitation along the riverfront. The City should consider using the Holyoke Economic Development and Industrial Corporation as the implementation agency for the redevelopment of this area.
Continue brownfield assessments and clean-up as appropriate.
Support HG&E plans for improvements to their land, including an open space element at the dam and along Canal Street that provides views to the River.RiverfrontRestore the Urban Neighborhoods Continue initiatives to stabilize current housing and introduce new housing options, including moderately priced housing to complement the existing affordable housing in these areas.
Support the Holyoke’s Housing Authority’s application for Hope VI funds to reconstruct the Lyman Terrace complex and the development of housing within a 3 mile radius.
Target for rehabilitation key vacant residential units that have valuable architectural character.Throughout DowntownReconnect the City through Gateways & Complete Streets
Many improvements can be initiated to begin developing complete streets throughout the Center City area.Improve StreetscapingCreating a unified streetscaping program which incorporates elements such as landscaping, roadside furniture and signage along key corridors in the downtown. This program should be more substantial for the downtown than other areas in the City, as this will send a clear message to the transportation network user that the conditions and character of these streets is different than other areas of the City. The differentiation of street conditions will help inform the motorist of the changing environment and better prepare them to drive appropriately.Throughout Downtown Incorporate Wayfinding SignageThe City is developing a local wayfinding signage program that is well defined and bold in appearance for use along major corridors in the downtown. Wayfinding signage located in other areas of City should not be consistent with that which is specifically used in downtown, but could be smaller in magnitude, consistent with the different environment surrounding local roadways.Throughout Downtown Gateway ImprovementsA combination of enhanced signage, landscaping and streetscap- ing can highlight a gateway and provide a positive experience. Effective signage should notify the user that they are entering the downtown, provide information regarding primary attractions and provide simple directions to these attractions. Signage, streetscap- ing and landscaping should be consistent.Bridge Locations and Key Corridors into the Downtown Update Traffic Signage, Signalization and Pavement MarkingsUpdate pavement markings and faded or damaged traffic signs. Investigate antiquated traffic signals to incorporate pedestrian accommodations or new signal timings to improve traffic flow, and investigate opportunities for new traffic signals to improve traffic flow.At Major Intersections and along Major Corridors ConnectivityInvestigate traffic flow and circulation patterns in downtown, including the Flats and South Holyoke. Identify a means to complete streets and connections to the riverfront and the center of downtown to promote economic development and preserve traffic capacity and access. Park ConnectionStudy the feasibility of discontinuing Route 202 between Linden Street and Dwight Street and connect the field on the south side to the field on the north side. Perform traffic studies to evaluate diverted traffic impacts as a result of eliminating this section of Route 202. Redesignating Route 202 may need to be investigated.Mitchell Field on Route 202 Maple & High StreetUpdate traffic signals, pavement markings, signage and parking to accommodate two-way traffic flow. Updated traffic studies would be needed to confirm feasibility and costs of these modifications.Between Appleton Street and Lyman Street Pedestrian EnhancementsImplement crosswalk treatments at major intersection where pedestrian traffic is high and investigate intersections where pedestrian activity may be increased.At Major Intersections and along Major Corridors
Let me reiterate: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. prepared this plan for the City of Holyoke & The Holyoke Redevelopment Authority on August 2nd 2009. This plan was officially released as a beautiful PDF document, and I've reproduced the entire plan for those who prefer to read online (and so that the contents of the plan can be scooped up by search engines & easily found by those interested in the topic).
17 Dec 2013 Donoku
28 Dec 2012 How to make SublimeLinter work with Ruby & RVM
09 Dec 2012 The tech behind getting Blizzalert into its third season
03 Nov 2012 Little-Corner is now a Heroku-ready Rails app
14 Oct 2012 Sip as a replacement for Pick as a replacement for Digital Color Meter in Mac OS X